Hahahahahaha….I like it when religious people use big words and give higher reasoning a try just to utterly fail like this without realizing it. Where do you even begin to show the flaws in this piece of sophistry. To quibble over semantics and conflate unrelated issues and then use that as “proof” that atheists are wrong and god is real. This is just pathetic.
I get these types of responses and run across these kinds of things all day long to the point where I am not even inclined to respond anymore to such moronic arguments, because no amount of reasoning and fact-based arguing works with entities that employ circular “reasoning”, whose “evidence” for their god is a fictional book and for whom “truth” is determined by how they want things to be, not by how things really are. See, below.